ABYSS WEB SERVER UBUNTU WINDOWS
Since unity/Shell first release, I returned to windows What the is behind those Gnome-shell, Unity ……? Yes: Microsoft is heading towards another debacle with Windows 8… same mistake here! #5 boylotton 08.10.12 at 15:00 Ubuntu doesn’t seems to meet great success with the other “PlaySkool” interface already out there on PCs too.
Maybe… but the reject is obvious, especially for a desktop environment that never messed with user experience before Gnome 3. “All in all it’s just another brick ‘out of’ the wall.” #4 yann on 08.10.12 at 12:51ĭebian also leave the boat… but some will still sing The poster sent us ‘0 which is not a hashcash value.
Gnome will survive as long as Red Hat uses it in RHEL, but its importance to users is gone. More efforst should have been spent to sort out annoying bugs and functions such as the sodding thumbnail housekeeping which rendered Gnome 2 desktops unusable for a couple of minutes after login. Funny how developers don’t realize that their users like to stick to usability concepts they have for years instead of happily accepting their new “improvements”. The Gnome team made their product redundant by changing too much in Gnome 3. Now, I’m on KDE 4 and I will switch to OS X soon… Isn’t ironic ? #3 Ziggyon 08.10.12 at 07:09 What’s the point destroying desktop experience (100% of Gnome users) ? A simple start menu is far better than this crap. I like the KISS (Keep It Simple & Stupid) philosophy, but Gnome Shell is joke that makes no sense at all. Gnome 3 ? Total disaster ! Although it’s somehow pretty, usability is a nightmare. It’s a good and simple desktop environment, maybe too old-fashioned nowadays. I cannot say the same for Unity - Ubuntu’s GUI interface.” “Gnome3 is open source, will always be open source.
ABYSS WEB SERVER UBUNTU SOFTWARE
In fact, these days GNOME describes itself as a “community that makes great software”, which is as nondescript as you can get for software development. Since then, nobody has managed to set new goals for the project.
ABYSS WEB SERVER UBUNTU FREE
Back then, the GNOME project had essentially achieved what it set out to do: a working Free desktop environment.
I first noticed this in 2005 when Jeff Waugh gave his 10×10 talk. (The 2nd page looks like 6 Red Hat employees versus 8 others with 6 translators/documenters.) This gives the GNOME project essentially a bus factor of 1. If you look at the Ohloh statistics again and ignore the 3 people working almost exclusively on GStreamer and the 2 working on translations, you get 10 Red Hat employees and 5 others. You’ll see a sharp drop off of committers on the first page already which suggests around 20 full-time developers at most.
We can also try Ohloh’s statistics for GNOME (they include 131 packages, including GStreamer and NetworkManager). I think evolution is in a similar situation (a complete email client). For anecdotal numbers: GTK has 1 person working full-time on it (me). This is hard to explain in a short and concise way. Both cite the need to look for something different, there is no hard feelings. The most recent examples are Emmanuele and Vincent. People certainly don’t seem to talk about them a lot.Ĭore developers are leaving GNOME development. I don’t want to talk about solutions here, I just want to list them, because I don’t think they are common knowledge. I’ll start by listing a bunch of things I consider facts about the GNOME project. I suppose I can’t just leave my last post standing there as-is.
0 kommentar(er)
